Cassidy Questions FEMA Ahead of Flood Insurance Rate Changes
WASHINGTON— U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D. is asking the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to clarify policy changes it intends to implement today, which could result in rate increases for some flood insurance holders across the country.
FEMA is penalizing Pre-FIRM policyholders who switch from the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) to private insurance carriers by subjecting them to full-risk rates and a loss of Pre-FIRM subsidized rates if they return to the NFIP. FEMA is considering these policyholders as having a “lapsed” policy, even if they had continuous coverage.
Dr. Cassidy and the Louisiana delegation led the charge to implement flood insurance reform, passing the Cassidy Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014 into law. FEMA is now incorrectly interpreting part of the Congressional intent the bill, which sought to encourage greater coverage amongst Pre-FIRM structures broadly, whether it be in the NFIP or in the private market.
Read the letter here and below:
March 31, 2016
The Honorable W. Craig Fugate
Federal Emergency Management Agency
US Department of Homeland Security
500 C Street SW
Washington DC, 20472
Dear Administrator Fugate:
I am writing on behalf of the thousands of Louisianans that participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). I am seeking clarification on recent policy changes your agency plans to implement April 1, 2016 regarding the elimination of subsidies for Pre – Flood Insurance Rate Map (Pre-FIRM) structures.
As you are aware, Section 205 of the Biggert-Water Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (BW-12) prohibits Pre-FIRM subsidized premiums for lapsed policies. Section 3 of the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act (HFIAA) further clarifies this prohibition by affording an exemption for policies that lapse due to the lender no longer requiring the insured to maintain coverage.
However, according to FEMA’s National Flood Insurance Program Write Your Own Program Bulletin W-15046, the agency has advised that a property covered by a non-NFIP policy purchased on the private market for the period longer than 120 days after NFIP coverage has expired is considered to have “lapsed” from the NFIP, even if there is no period of time that the property was not insured for flood damage. Therefore Pre-FIRM policyholders that have continuous coverage through a private policy carrier but that seek to return to the NFIP will be subject to full-risk rates and a loss of Pre-FIRM subsidized rates. This policy change seems to contradict the intention of Section 100239 of BW-12 where Congress explicitly allowed federal agencies to accept private flood insurance policies to fulfill mortgage requirements instead of policies offered solely through the NFIP, if the private flood insurance policies complied with the conditions stipulated in statute . Given these policy changes, please provide answers to the following:
1. Do you believe FEMA has provided guidance that discourages private insurers from entering into the marketplace?
2. Do you believe the ability of a consumer to choose a service provider is key in developing a healthy insurance market?
3. Why has FEMA elected to penalize those who seek private insurance, and encourage NFIP participants to stay exclusively within the program?
Part of the Congressional intent of BW-12 and the HFIAA was to encourage greater coverage amongst Pre-FIRM structures broadly, whether it be in the NFIP or in the private market. Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated.
Bill Cassidy, M.D.
United States Senator
Next Article Previous Article